In the world of business mediation, it is crucial to understand a wide range of approaches and techniques, especially when dealing with international disputes. With ever-increasing interactions between the public and private sectors, the need for effective mediation strategies has never been more prominent.

​

The Dutch MFN model is central to the European approach to mediation. It places a strong emphasis on collaboration, building consensus and finding common ground. It is about creating a platform where parties can express their concerns and interests in a neutral and protective environment.

​

In contrast, the American Mediation model, which has its origins in a more competitive business environment, emphasizes the importance of strategic negotiations and often results-oriented outcomes. There is a clear focus on achieving concrete solutions, which makes it particularly effective in business transactions where results are paramount.

​

The Swedish model offers a balanced mix of both. It combines the collaborative approach of the Dutch model with the results-oriented approach of the American model, making it suitable for a wide range of disputes.

​

Our own experience in mediation, especially within the large corporate domain, has shown that the American model is often preferred in high-stakes situations where quick, concrete results are required. For example, in discussions with leading technology and telecom companies. However, the value of the MFN model should not be overlooked, especially in more complex, nuanced situations where understanding and valuing multiple interests is central.

​

Mediation is not a one-size-fits-all solution, but rather a spectrum of techniques and approaches that can be tailored to the unique needs of each dispute. For those entering the international arena, it is essential to thoroughly understand these models and their applications.