Legacy Layers in Mergers & Acquisitions: Untangling Before You Integrate
- jordizwart
- Apr 12
- 2 min read
Behind every merger or acquisition lies more than financial potential—it conceals a web of operational legacies. Over time, organisations accumulate ‘system wrappers’: layers of culture, process, governance, and unspoken norms that may once have made sense, but now complicate integration. Just as in legacy IT systems, these layers can slow down synergy, frustrate leadership, and increase costs. Effective mediation can help untangle this before the deal, or people, start to break.

The Hidden Legacy Behind Every Deal
In technology, legacy systems are often viewed as burdens: outdated, resistant to change, hard to maintain. But in organisations, legacy takes many forms; hierarchical structures, cultural rituals, shadow governance, or even duplicated reporting lines. These aren't always visible in due diligence, but they show up fast post-merger.
If left unaddressed, this 'organisational code' leads to resistance, misalignment, and failed integrations. It’s not a matter of systems alone, it’s people, power, trust.
M&A: A Collision of Organisational Histories
Every organisation brings its own operational DNA to the table. M&A isn’t just about combining functions, it's about reconciling decades of embedded assumptions. Which rules are flexible? Which informal leaders are essential? Which processes exist only because “that’s how we’ve always done it”?
Without mediation, this becomes a tug of war between two legacies, often escalating to friction, attrition, or even litigation.
Mediation as Strategic Untangling
Traditional M&A integration focuses on structure and synergy. Mediation goes deeper:
It surfaces unspoken expectations
It clarifies where legacy adds value, and where it blocks progress
It allows space for cultural alignment before formal integration
By working through these dynamics with a neutral mediator, parties can avoid the zero-sum game of “winner culture” vs. “acquired culture”. Instead, mediation can facilitate co-designed systems that are simpler, aligned, and forward-looking.
From Inherited Complexity to Shared Simplicity
Untangling is not the same as discarding. The goal is not to erase history, but to recognise which parts of it serve the new vision, and which don't. Good mediation creates clarity about:
Which processes to retain, merge, or eliminate
Where authority should reside post-deal
How to align values without suppressing identity
It’s this level of reflection that often gets skipped in dealmaking, but determines success more than any spreadsheet.
Legacy Isn’t the Enemy, Inertia Is
Legacy exists because something worked once. But in a post-merger reality, the real threat is not the past, it’s the inability to question it. Mediation brings that conversation forward early. It creates the psychological safety needed to evolve systems before inefficiency becomes entrenched.
Closing Thought
In M&A, integration is not just technical, it's emotional, behavioural and symbolic. Just like in IT, layering one system on top of another without rethinking the architecture leads to hidden fragility. Mediation can help you untangle before you integrate, and create a system that serves the future, not the past.



Comments